WYSIWYG

What You See Is What You Get. This is a journal blog, an explore-blog, a bit of this and that blog. Sharing where the mood takes me. Perhaps it will take you too.

Menoculayshunal; Shifting Gears

By the time we returned to Sandeepany following the idyll that was Chinmaya Vibhooti, there was something of a different mood around the place. Part of it is that thing that happens when everyone realises we are closer to the end than the beginning and that there is an enormous amount of work still to be covered. Then there is the writing of dissertations/theses. 

...say what?!!
That took an interesting turn. Bearing in mind that we were essentially producing work for a PhD, we were asked at first to submit by the end of March (2013) our average 80k words. All 60 of us did that and had them returned with positive and constructive comments... and the request to reduce that same work into 20k words. 😮 Okay. Six weeks later, we managed to distil our work somehow and received them again with positive and constructive comments... and the request, finally, to reduce the same work to no more than 2000 words. 😵 If you haven't cottoned on by now, the concepts and precepts of Advaita are - - intense - - complex - - some might say obscure... so to present our ideas in such a condensed manner seemed peculiar. Then it was announced that there would not be 60 different theses published, but one single volume for the course. Eight students did not have their work entered (although their efforts were acknowledged in the endnotes) due to lateness or not meeting the required standard. Thus we ended up with one comprehensive manual of Vedantic thought from Batch 15 Gurukula Sandeepany Sadhanalaya. The result was an amazingly congruent flow of chapters covering many aspects, from the practical application to the esoteric and around the corners of conundrums. This, it turned out, had been an exercise not in academic prowess alone but the consistency of thought, appreciation of a common mind and sequestration of the ego.

Additional workgroups were added, and our afternoon personal time grew less. We were to cover all the learning that would go with working within the Chinmaya Mission establishment. Those of us taking the yellow robes would be assigned to centres all around India and the globe, and we had to be able to teach at all levels. A particular emphasis was given to Balvihar - akin to Sunday School in church. This is a very popular program with Indian families in every corner of the planet, even if the parents themselves do not attend Vedanta class. It covers ages 5 yrs - 15yrs. In the next three years, children are expected to concentrate on their final years at school. Once they reach 18, they can join the CHYK group - Chinmaya Yuva Kendra. This group can be taken up to age 35. There are GRhasta (Householder/Adult) study groups and Jnana Yagnas (public discourses) and then Vana Prastha groups - over 60s age group. Other things too, like Swaranjali (dedicated music groups). 

Elsewhere, CM has an entire system of regular schools around India and an international boarding school. Another branch is CORD - the rural support and development program, which is very successful.

Anyway, you get the picture. No longer were we simply learning our subject, but also inculcating the values and programs of the Mission. However, something else arose that caused me to take stock during this time. Several discussions were had about the role of religion in politics. There was a fellow jostling for the role of prime minister of India. He was creating waves and stirring up what is referred to as Hindutva. Unsettlingly, a few among the students clearly subscribed to this thinking. I was further perturbed to find that the meeting hall by the library was being leased to the local chapter of the RSS...(Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh)

I, to be clear, am very against the mixing, indeed the conflation, of politics and religion. What has happened in India since my departure is heartbreaking. That jostling fellow achieved his aim. 

Everything that Modi stands for and spouts is contrary to Advaita, yet the Mission has to tread the tightrope with him due to his spiritual guru being none other than our own Sw. Tejomayananda (Guru-ji). At no time does the Mission engage in teaching what could be construed as Hindutva - but I had to wrangle with the understanding that some in its ranks are not going to decry the very un-Vedantic words and actions of the country's most powerful man. 

I know I was not alone. But I am not here to talk for others on this. I can only relate that the presence of those brown shirts on the ashram was a final straw - while still devoted entirely to Vedantic life and to the Mission as a whole, I came to understand that I would not be able to curb my political self sufficiently to survive comfortably within its structure.

That was a huge realisation, only three months out from graduation.


NB: there will again be a break from these memoir posts as April is dedicated to A-Z activity. On return in May, we will reach the concluding 'mop-up' posts...

14 comments:

  1. It is indeed sad to see 'religion' associated with politics.

    ReplyDelete
  2. While the two must be separate, it is great to allow one's convictions to influence how one lives them out in the voting booth. Keeping my thoughts to myself in not political situations is a real challenge. Sending love. namaste, janice xx

    ReplyDelete
  3. Given that both religion and politics concern, in different ways, how people live their lives, I think it's unrealistic to expect them always to be separate, no matter how much one might wish it.
    Cheers, Gail.
    PS One unanticipated benefit of doing an actual PhD, rather than any other form of higher level study, is that one never finds oneself having to explain to other people that you've done the equivalent of a PhD!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hari OM
      I don't believe I wrote that it was the 'equivalent to', but that we were 'essentially doing' a PhD. What was interesting was that our acharya kept mentioning it himself. Now that CM has a fully registered University underway, I suspect there will be a formalisation of qualification, eventually. Simply to comply with conventional global standards. Though the point of the reduction of our dissertations into an absolute kernel concept was a purely Advaitic approach that is unlikely to be found anywhere else! This was written not to boast any qualification, but to give an idea of the work involved.

      Religion is intended for each individual to make of life what they wish. Politics, if democratically applied, is where a number of individuals are provided the privilege of managing things for the wider community, ideally for the greater benefit of the people in it. Sadly, some individuals mistake their personal preference for a particular doctrine for being the same as common law. The 'religion' can simply be what is mine, is mine, and what is yours is also mine...If enough people of that mind bind together as a political party we have the rise of tyranny. It can be very subtle and disguised as democracy, or completely brazen, such as seen in Russia... and, I fear, India. I agree that to desire it otherwise may seem idealistic, but that is no reason not to still have that desire. Sadly, those of us of this mind are not the ones who enter politics (or survive it if we do) because it is a very dirty place to be... YAM xx

      Delete
    2. Couldn't agree more than with those final sentiments.

      Delete
  4. your last sentence says what i have always said about politics.. if someone is in politics they are dirty. no way to get there without being dirty and the few good people left do not want to be in the mess of it all.
    unfortunately the countries, ours included that say religion and politics are separate are certainly NOT...

    ReplyDelete
  5. I did not go past high school because the things you write about here, like the three thesis and going down and down make me CRAZY... now if they had a degree in talking??? I would be there. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  6. I love the caption under the pigeon's picture.
    Unless I know someone very very well, I never discuss politics or religion.
    Hugs Cecilia

    ReplyDelete
  7. Condensing 80k words to 20k words must have been quite a task!

    Regarding mixing of religion with politics ... that's what politics has been all about in India, even from right before Independence. Religion played a big role in the birth of the two nations. And that legacy continues today, decelerating the progress that we make.

    No political party in India has been able to keep religion (and caste) aside. The perception (right or wrong) is that they won't win any votes if they don't pander to extremist ideas of one religion or the other.

    The focus is not on development projects (be it health, education, transport, housing, public infrastructure ... ). They are all secondary to matters related to various religions and castes in India.

    Public discourses and election issues aren't about how India can be a better nation in terms of the living conditions of its citizens. It's about religion; nothing else. Every conversation and every debate, finally winds its way to something related to religion.

    If a student has topped her exams or won a medal, a connection is to be made to her religion. I often wonder isn't there any identity for an individual other than his or her religion and faith?

    Fuelled by the freedom that the free-for-all social media platforms provides to air one's views, this is only getting worse by the day.

    I don't know if it's like this in every society/country. Or it's more, or less in India.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hari OM
      Pradeep-bhai, thank you for your response and insight. You have voiced exactly my thoughts, though I tend to feel constrained to comment overly much on what has taken place in India for, although so warmly and gladly adopted by it, the people, and now my choice of faith practice, it can only ever be perceived (as is so often the case all over the world), that I am an 'outsider' to it. In fact, I am now also an outsider within my own original society...

      Regarding your final sentence - this is the case everywhere, but for the most part, democracy does work well. I absolutely accept that anyone in power is entitled to have a faith or philosophy that drives them. There can be no separation of ideals with ideas when it comes to that. One would hope/wish/desire that the highest standards of those philosophies (and when all philosophies are held together, there is always the common denominator of simply being the best human beings we can be!) Sadly, the human-animal falls to that animal side so very often; greed, avarice, attack as a defence... Having now lived and very closely experienced the societal approach in India that you describe and also having lived in several other countries for significant periods, I can say that the sub-continent is certainly the most prone to religion BEING its politics. It faces similar issues that Israel does in that the faith structure is also very much the guiding force of daily living. When it comes down to it, it is not each religion that is at fault but that some of the adherents of any religion take it to extremes, use small parts of their scriptures as mantras by which to bully others and, at the extreme level now being witnessed, use it as justification for horrors... well... it is enough to test one's faith!!! YAM xx

      Delete
  8. To the extent a religion provides a moral guidance which builds on humans being a social species it has a place in everything we do. Unfortunately it often becomes distorted into dogma, ritualized, packaged, performed rather than felt or absorbed, and of course used as a tool of manipulation for those with political aspiration. The result is that I've become cynical about references to religious culture, 'god on our side', and similar 'spoutings' and have been heard to allege that religion was designed to keep the masses poor and stupid. A few transcend and most just go through the motions rather than thinking about or analysing the underlying philosophy, or questioning the rituals, the material inputs, or the demands of (often) self-appointed leaders.

    Oohh you have started somthing this week. I liked Pradeeps contribution. It helps expand my understanding.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hari OM
      As ever, I am grateful that my readers are prepared to take time with these posts - and then, too, to engage in the conversation! All angles on an issue must surely shed a wider light. Yxx

      Delete
  9. "Everything that Modi stands for and spouts is contrary to Advaita..." My problem with Modi is precisely that - approximately! [I'm aware of the oxymoron in that precise approximation.] He has no idea of what Hinduism essentially is about. He is misusing a whole philosophy with its immense potential for profundity for his own political agenda. Consequently he is perverting a religion or spiritual philosophy as well as the psyche of a whole nation. This perversion has long-lasting consequences.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hari OM
      Quite so, Tomichan-bhai, quite so. Difficult not to be depressed by it... YAM xx

      Delete

Inquiry and debate are encouraged.
Be grown-ups, please, and play nice.
🙏