As begun last week, we are now in the territory of having to explore some of the tenets of Advaitic philosophy within this memoir to give context to the experience of Sandeepany and ashram living based upon said philosophy. In that post, attempts were made to convey something of the effect upon me that brought me to this PhD level study in the first place. Remember, this was not in a field I had formally studied up till now. I'd begun as an analyst/programmer, went through banking and medicine and yet here I was... the simple fact being that throughout all of those career choices, there was the underlying drive to understand a purpose in life... to understand MY purpose in life. And as I have said before, we can read all we like about another's experience, but in the end, unless we actually expose ourselves to the same circumstances, how can we judge?
The spiritual element arose in childhood, and even with some spells of 'darkness,' it never left. How to explain this? Why is it that others, who may indeed have similar experiences, name them differently? Interestingly, two comments of very similar content arose from last week's post; the idea of inherent traits and how one views the spiritual. (Thank you, Gail and Mark!) These were perfect inquiries to lead into today's post - and into next week's, too.
![]() |
Photo by Monil Andharia on Unsplash |
The driving factor to our daily living comes from that connection. How aware we are of it depends, according to karmic law, on how frequently Atma has reabsorbed our individualised soul (jiva). Each jiva is likened to the sparks from a fire. They are spat out by the heat of the fire to rise and glow for a while, then darken and fall back to the embers. Some will be rekindled, others not. The sparks are continually thrown until all combustible energy in their substance is exhausted, and there is nothing left to burn.
No analogy can wholly interpret the nature of the soul, but this goes a long way toward it. We are, all of us, sparks from a single fire. We cannot know how many times we have been 'thrown up' to glow in the dark. Neither is the number of times the same for all. All that we know is the glow that we are currently experiencing. We are all in the praarabdha stage of our cycle. What happens to our jiva selves remains at source (Atma/fire); in its preparation stage, anything that happens to the individualised ember is sanchita. The combination of sanchita and praarabdha give rise to a store of possible outcomes in the future - agami. But remember, at all times, we are the fire only.
All the sparks - we humans - perceive themselves to be alone and special. There is attachment to the physical being, the emotional being, the mental being - the ego. I-ness and my-ness abound such that when we are falling back toward the fire (ageing, facing 'death') we cling to these things. However, just as actual sparks which go through the flames many times are each time changed and altered, so is the jiva. Some jivas come to understand the cycle, while others are still not enough burned and tempered. We cannot all be at the same level of experience within karma. We cannot all appreciate that karma is the process of constant work, as our jiva is refined as a jeweller refines a diamond.
To be continued...
Excellent! I love the analogy of fire and sparks as related to karma. Thanks! BTW I have added you to the digital art draw for selfies Sunday! Have a marvellously happy day!
ReplyDeleteAs always, beautifully explained, Yamini. :-)
ReplyDeleteit fits perfectly to monday sparks...
ReplyDeleteF's brain is struggling a bit. On a pure explanatory level the fire analogy makes perfect sense but the absorption to a level where understanding is a feeling, is a familiar and comfortable garment, is getting up in the night and walking easily to the bathroom without putting on lights - that's eluding her. It might be the unfamiliar sounding words, but she does appreciate that translation doesn't work when our culture doesn't directly share the philosophy. They are names for things we haven't named.... xxx Mr T
ReplyDeleteHari OM
DeleteAnd I appreciate that you took the time to read, nonetheless! This is - I now recognise - one of the reasons I have not until now properly approached discussing my time at Sandeepany. It is impossible to do so without broaching some of the subject itself.. because when it comes to discussing some of the highly personal aspects, they need to be understood from this perspective. This is material that I had already spent three years reading intensively and in group discussions and it is going to seem very esoteric. To avoid writing these points, however, would make continuing with the memoir not just bland and detached, but also, perhaps, pointless. Yxx
Oh yes indeed my brain is struggling a bit too. However, I truly appreciate the time you take to explain this to us.
ReplyDeleteMy background is Southern Baptist; however, over all the years of working with international scholars from all over the world I learned how important it was to listen as they shared culture and traditions...and they were equally accepting of all things Southern and eager to learn. I had some rather amusing discussions about the Queen's English words and Southern English words too. Maybe that would be a good FFF
Hugs Cecilia
I am going to be totally honest. I read about halfway through I did not understand any of what I was reading and I could not read the rest of it it just doesn't fit into what I understand or want to understand. You're talking to somebody who reads only fiction.
ReplyDeleteStruggling here too! But don't give up on us. It's always interesting to read about something so outside of what one normally thinks about.
ReplyDeleteCheers, Gail.
Your information has left me wondering if the recycling of the energy and wisdom gained becomes reflected in the ensuing cycles of self. namaste, janice xx
ReplyDelete